alè! il presuntuoso cretino è anche esperto di medicina.
sapevamolo, gli avremmo chiesto subito l'elisir di lunga vita.
cmq il terrapiattista che ha costruito i grafici della relazione è il Dr. Edward H. Kass, al tempo (1970) President of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, nonchè Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School e varie altre rettilianate (vedi new york times)
la cosa ridicola dell'intervento del poveretto de noantri (anti) è che chi ha scritto l'articolo è d'accordo con lui:
Vaccines didn’t save humanity. Their impact was somewhere between 1-3.5% of the total decline in mortality rates. Improvement in sanitation and standards of living really did (nutrition, living conditions, etc.). Did vaccines contribute to a small decrease of certain acute illnesses? Yes, but their relative benefit is often exaggerated to an extreme, and then used to browbeat, guilt, and scare parents.
So am I saying no one should vaccinate? No, I’m not. Vaccines provide temporary protection from certain acute illnesses. Some matter more than others. I personally think we give way too many vaccines, and I think the risk/benefit equation of each vaccine is often obscured. Worse, the lie that vaccines saved humanity in the twentieth century has turned many vaccine promoters into zealots, even though their narratives are simply not supported by the facts. But, by all means, get as many vaccines as you want, I respect your right to make your own medical care choices.
sarebbe bastato leggere le conclusioni, ma quelle di solito sono in fondo e il presuntuoso cretino non ce la fa, ha bisogno di sparare subito la sua inutile filippica
patetico rinco