By: tia86 on Martedì 22 Luglio 2014 07:21
>Il fenomeno nucleare è certo, la possibilità di definirlo 'Rossi' no
Questo è quello che pensi TU, ma non quello che sta dicendo rossi.
Attualmente i 'professori' stanno rifacendo le misure per vedere SE funziona, non COME funziona. Cosa pure confermata da Rossi:
Q: are the Professors also involved in theory assessment ?
A.R.: #b#their activity right now is measurements#/b#, but the results, if the so called “Rossi Effect” will be confirmed, will unavoidably imply a theoretical follow up, I guess.
A.R.:I predict another scenario: #b#if the validity of the so called Rossi Effect#/b# will find confirmation in the report of the TIP and in the operation of the first plants installed, this technology will have the development within the limits of its potentiality inside the market.
Q: Dear Dr. Rossi, you often write about results positive or negative. The word “negative” isn’t clear for me, because we all know that the “Rossi Effect” is real.
A.R. : We are working very hard to merit the enthusiasm of persons like you. We are making a hard work of R&D and validation and we will publish the results after such work will have been completed, whatever the results, positive or negative, as I always said. Until then, my duty as a scientist is to say that no specific answer can be given to questions regarding if the results will be positive or negative. All I can say is that the work based upon the so called Rossi Effect is carried on with scientific rigor.
Quindi per cortesia non essere piu realista del re. Rossi sta chiaramente dicendo che non sa neppure lui se c'è qualcosa o no, non sta parlando se la natura del fenomeno è fisica nuova o meno.