ma ci credo, infatti il fumerone degli incendi in california e arrivato fino a new yor

e fare scendere le temperature oltre la media

perche  blocca i raggi solari e quindi siamo tutti d accordo che immettere nell atmosfera

dei gas o dei fumi o altro, qualche impatto sul clima lo provoca...

opsm dimenticavo...a proposito di fumo

come sta andando la tua grande accumulazione di bitcoin??

ehe hahahuhh oi oi oi oi oi oi

questo sono io prossimamente, quando andrò a prendere uno per uno (avrò parecchio da fare) i cog.ioni che hanno dirottato risorse immense a combattere le emissioni di co2, come se un (ipotetico, ipoteticissimo) grado in più possa fare chissà quali disastri.

Qui si descrive cosa avviene invece quando le temperature scendono:

Why 536 was ‘the worst year to be alive’

spampana?! che fai? sostituisci i post?

ma come! era così interessante... un comportamento davvero disdicevole

cmq anche la tua ultima "fatica" la dice lunga a chi vuol capire

l’ex segretario statunitense dell’energia, nonché primo scienziato a ricoprire quel ruolo

tanto per pareggiare:

Why a ‘Super’ Grand Solar Minimum Is Upon Us

...

nel frattempo: comincia a vacillare la cbs?

Will The Snowiest Decade Continue?

Interestingly, some scientists have stated that increasing snow is consistent with climate change because warmer air holds more moisture, more water vapor and this can result in more storms with heavy precipitation. The trick, of course, is having sufficient cold air to produce that snow. But note that 93% of the years with more than 60″ of snow in Boston were colder than average years. The reality is cooling, not warming, increases snowfall. 

ecco gianlini, secondo te il post qui sotto ha qualche attinenza con il titolo del thread?

warning: se rispondi sì, sei stupido come spampana

questi premo nobel

rettiliani

Il premio Nobel Steven Chu: “A causa del cambiamento climatico, prepariamoci a evacuare 750 milioni di persone”

Abbiamo incontrato l’ex segretario statunitense dell’energia, nonché primo scienziato a ricoprire quel ruolo, per capire come la ricerca e la politica possano agire contro il riscaldamento globale. Tra le altre cose, entro due secoli dovrà migrare almeno un decimo dell’umanità

quello è il paesaggio del tuo cervellino.

ps: ero stato facile profeta:

Per fortuna si guarderanno bene dal leggerla e potranno continuare a belare felici nel gregge

rusting wind farms

come questa ?

:-)

ce la fai a leggere 8 (otto) righe?

So there you have it. An implausible conjecture backed by false evidence and repeated incessantly has become politically correct ‘knowledge,’ and is used to promote the overturn of industrial civilization. What we will be leaving our grandchildren is not a planet damaged by industrial progress, but a record of unfathomable silliness as well as a landscape degraded by rusting wind farms and decaying solar panel arrays.
There is at least one positive aspect to the present situation. None of the proposed policies will have much impact on greenhouse gases. Thus we will continue to benefit from the one thing that can be clearly attributed to elevated carbon dioxide: namely, its effective role as a plant fertilizer, and reducer of the drought vulnerability of plants. Meanwhile, the IPCC is claiming that we need to prevent another 0.5◦C of warming, although the 1◦C that has occurred so far has been accompanied by the greatest increase in human welfare in history.

in breve..

che dice?

sto aiutando nonna a fare la crostate con le prugne..mica ho tempo

ossignur!

ma questi rettiliani non smettono di insidiare le deboli menti degli anti e degli spampana!

me li immagino, i loro cervellini, in piena dissonanza cognitiva alla lettura di questa relazione del rettilianissimo Richard Lindzen (an American atmospheric physicist known for his work in the dynamics of the middle atmosphere, atmospheric tides, and ozone photochemistry. He has published more than 200 scientific papers and books. From 1983 until his retirement in 2013, he was Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was a lead author of Chapter 7, "Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks," of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Third Assessment Report on climate change.)

Per fortuna si guarderanno bene dal leggerla e potranno continuare a belare felici nel gregge

Conclusion
So there you have it. An implausible conjecture backed by false evidence and repeated incessantly has become politically correct ‘knowledge,’ and is used to promote the overturn of
industrial civilization. What we will be leaving our grandchildren is not a planet damaged by industrial progress, but a record of unfathomable silliness as well as a landscape degraded
by rusting wind farms and decaying solar panel arrays. False claims about 97% agreement will not spare us, but the willingness of scientists to keep mum is likely to much reduce trust in and support for science. Perhaps this won’t be such a bad thing after all – certainly as concerns ‘official’ science.
There is at least one positive aspect to the present situation. None of the proposed policies will have much impact on greenhouse gases. Thus we will continue to benefit from the
one thing that can be clearly attributed to elevated carbon dioxide: namely, its effective role as a plant fertilizer, and reducer of the drought vulnerability of plants. Meanwhile, the IPCC
is claiming that we need to prevent another 0.5◦C of warming, although the 1◦C that has occurred so far has been accompanied by the greatest increase in human welfare in history.
As we used to say in my childhood home of the Bronx: ‘Go figure’.

no panapeto, si sono estinti 65 milioni di anni fa

possibile

scoregge di dinosauro == metano

https://inhabitat.com/dinosaur-farts-may-have-caused-the-last-global-warming/

anche shera scriva 1000 volte sul suo quadernino "qui si parla di: Clima, Riscaldamento Globale"