By: Rampa_di_lancio on Sabato 12 Settembre 2015 15:11
Solo per chiarezza, visto che ci si ostina a dire che Rossi ha brevettato una reazione chimica.
No! Rossi ha brevettato un dispositivo dove a suo dire e da come viene scritto e accettato nel brevetto [00213] [00214] [00215], avvengono o meglio si ipotizzano reazioni di trasmutazione nucleare.
#i#"[00204] This result shows that the burning process in E-Cat changes the reactive material at the nuclear level, ie nuclear reactions have taken place.In the SIMS analysis the 7 Li content was 7.9% and in the ICP-MS analysis it was 42.5 %.This result shows that the burning process in E-Cat changes the reactive material at the nuclear level, ie nuclear reactions have taken place.It is notable that also in Astrophysics, a 7 Li depletion is observed #b#[see eg Reference 17].#/b#
[00205] Considering Li and disregarding for a moment Coulomb barrier, the depletion of 7 Li might be due to the reaction p + 7 Li— > 8 Be— > He+ 4 He.
[00206] Another change in the ash as compared to the unused reactive material is the identified change in the isotope composition of Ni.
[00208] Accordingly, from Nickel and Accordingly, from Nickel and Lithium together there is about 3 MWh available, which is twice the amount given away in the test run. Consequently, it can be concluded that the amount of reactive material may be compatible with the energy release being measured.
...but after the 32 days run the isotopic composition has changed both for Lithium and Nickel."
In the ash sample, some ions, i.e. Li and Ni have an abundance deviating from the natural abundance.
#/i#
La reazione brevettata non è chimica e si ipotizza essere nucleare, date le variazioni isotopiche..."riscontrate"... ovviamente riferite al report di Lugano.