By: lmwillys on Giovedì 27 Novembre 2014 21:05
UPDATE: I heard from Andrea S. who has admitted this document was not genuine — see this message below:
Dear Frank,
As you probably suspected, there is no Sic Industries LLC, it is a little practical joke on some Cobraf bloggers who were prompting me to assess feasibility of the three-fold resistance drop.
I didn’t mean to make fun of you at E-Cat World, let alone the MFMP who is doing a fantastic job in the quest for truth: their investigation is key to understand whether the optical thermography can be trusted.
I am not qualified to argue on that part. I have posted a critical review of the power input data of the TPR2 where I didn’t rule out the possibility of a nonlinear resistance as (tardively) claimed by Rossi, rather I showed that if one does assume this nonlinearity, then the infamous Figure 5 doesn’t match the expected pulsewidth.
Nevertheless I did give a look to the possibility that the dogbone may embed a SiC resistor. It is highly unlikely, but one willing to attempt a replication may use this datasheet as a requirements specification for a (real) resistor manufacturer.
Please forgive this little trick of mine.
Best regards,
--------
meno male, la mamma si era preoccupata :-))))
più che altro mi dispiace per Nevanlinna, si è frantumata tristemente la sua opinione di Andrea.s ... :-)