un povero mentecatto da rinchiudere che mai ha messo piede in Cina
un pezzetto di un post di Emad , ripropone la domandina che vi ho postato qui per un decennio, 'una volta eliminato il lavoro anche dal vocabolario in base a COSA distribuisci la ricchezza ?'.... siccome è di Emad è un articolo intelligente quindi leggibile, non una perdita di tempo dietro coglionate in libertà libertarie
----------
Marx’s theory of surplus value is particularly relevant to understanding the implications of AI-driven economies. In a post-labor economy, surplus value might be redistributed through mechanisms like universal basic income or public ownership of AI infrastructure, ensuring that the gains from AI-driven productivity benefit broader society rather than concentrating exclusively in the hands of those who own the underlying systems.
Historically, surplus value arose from human labor, with capitalists profiting from the disparity between labor’s productivity and its cost. AI introduces non-human agents as the primary drivers of productivity, shifting the locus of surplus value to the ownership of algorithms, datasets, and computational systems. This fundamental reallocation amplifies the urgency of addressing capital ownership to prevent worsening economic inequality.
-----------
