Trame, Connessioni, Network e Intrighi


  By: Moderatore on Giovedì 30 Gennaio 2014 20:31

La Mailing List di ^un originale personaggio australiano, Peter Myers#^, connette tra loro le menti più acute del circuito alternativo a quello ufficiale e Myers garantisce che non vi si infiltrino le solite esagerazioni, boiate o anche appunto che vi si infilino "troiani" che intercettano il discorso lo deviano e lo confondono. Ci trovi tutte le fonti serie che esistono al mondo che riflettono sulle trame, connessioni, network e intrighi tramite i quali è governato il mondo. Vi appaiono a commentare e riportare notizie oltre a Peter ad esempio Michael Hudson, Shamir Gilead Atzmon... Alan Sabrosky. Metto qui senza commenti una lunga email circolata oggi. Sono che che è bene sapere, pur essendo consci che non ci può fare niente e che se dovessero veramente cominciare a circolare ^qualcuno potrebbe essere vittima di qualche incidente#^. ----- Alan Sabrosky on "worker bees" & 9/11; history of "Catalytic Events" to enrage the US public Alan Sabrosky was Director of Studies at the US Army War College; he is of part-Jewish descent, but an American Patriot. Coming out on 9/11 would have taken a lot of courage on his part. Let me express my gratitude, on behalf of us all - Peter M. (1) Executive Director of Christians United For Israel is Jewish, a former AIPAC official (2) Myers to Sabrosky on Mazzucco's 9/11 DVD: does it matter that it omits Mossad role? (3) Alan Sabrosky on "worker bees" & 9/11; history of "Catalytic Events" to enrage the US public (4) 9/11 And Israel: Alan Sabrosky's Shocking Press TV Interview (5) September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor: A film by Massimo Mazzucco, reviewed by David Ray Griffin (6) Guess Who Michael Moore's Agent Is? (7) Video of Urban Moving Systems van (8) Greg Palast's father is a cousin of David Kimche, former deputy director of Mossad - Christopher Bollyn (9) Richard Gage 10-minute video (Dec 2012) links 9/11 to Police State, US invasions (10) Radio interview with Christopher Bollyn: Odigo instant messages (11) Haaretz repeats Odigo report "Odigo says workers were warned of attack". But no news from FBI, and no mention in US media (12) Newsbytes "Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC Attack" (27 September 2001) (13) Bollyn on US Media ignoring Odigo text message warning of 9/11 (14) September 11: Inside Job or Mossad Job? by Laurent Guyénot (1) Executive Director of Christians United For Israel is Jewish, a former AIPAC official Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:38:56 -0600 From: Alan Sabrosky <> To: Subject: Re: Pentagon classifies Evangelical Christians, and Catholics, as "domestic hate groups" You might be interested in knowing that the executive director of CUFI (Christians United For Israel), AIPAC's Christian counterpart and a powerful force in the Republican Party, is (or was, when I last looked a couple of months ago) Jewish and a former AIPAC official. I think this is him, but it may be a successor with similar credentials: -Alan Executive Director, Christians United for Israel David Brog is the executive director of Christians United for Israel (CUFI). Before CUFI, Brog worked in the United States Senate for seven years, rising to be chief of staff to Senator Arlen Specter and staff director of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He has also served as an executive at America Online and practiced corporate law in Tel Aviv, Israel and Philadelphia, PA. Brog is the author of Standing with Israel: Why Christians Support the Jewish State (2006) and In Defense of Faith: the Judeo-Christian Idea and the Struggle for Humanity (2010). In 2007, the Forward newspaper listed Brog in its "Forward 50" most influential Jews in America. He is a graduate of Princeton University and Harvard Law School. Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:38:56 -0600 From: Alan Sabrosky <> To: Subject: Re: Pentagon classifies Evangelical Christians, and Catholics, as "domestic hate groups" You might be interested in knowing that the executive director of CUFI (Christians United For Israel), AIPAC's Christian counterpart and a powerful force in the Republican Party, is (or was, when I last looked a couple of months ago) Jewish and a former AIPAC official. I think this is him, but it may be a successor with similar credentials: -Alan Executive Director, Christians United for Israel David Brog is the executive director of Christians United for Israel (CUFI). Before CUFI, Brog worked in the United States Senate for seven years, rising to be chief of staff to Senator Arlen Specter and staff director of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He has also served as an executive at America Online and practiced corporate law in Tel Aviv, Israel and Philadelphia, PA. Brog is the author of Standing with Israel: Why Christians Support the Jewish State (2006) and In Defense of Faith: the Judeo-Christian Idea and the Struggle for Humanity (2010). In 2007, the Forward newspaper listed Brog in its "Forward 50" most influential Jews in America. He is a graduate of Princeton University and Harvard Law School. (2) Myers to Sabrosky on Mazzucco's 9/11 DVD: does it matter that it omits Mossad role? Alan, Thanks for that information about CUFI; I will use it. It's good to hear from you. I had been thinking of emailing you to ask your opinion of Mazzucco's DVD (3 DVD set) about 9/11; I watched it recently. It's very persuasive, but makes no mention of Mossad or any Israeli connection - eg the Odigo instant messages or the white vans & the dancing Mossad agents, or Mossad's track record of using Stolen identities (Dubai assassination cf 9/11 hijackers). Should one credit him with making the Truth case more credible; or blame him for censorship? Suppose that more people do come over to the idea that it was an Inside Job - will they not just pin the blame on George Bush Jnr, Cheney, and a few others at the top of Norad, the CIA, FBI, FAA and other agencies, with no Israeli connection? Which raises the question: how wide could such a conspiracy be? How many people could have been in on it? These questions apply to Pearl Harbor as well as 9/11. I reckon that conspirators have to keep the circle - of those in the know - small. The more that know, the more risk of someone confessing. Underlings - eg people picking up & removing debris on the Pentagon lawn (which was illegal, this being a crime scene) - would probably not have been in on it. There would have been a "Need to Know" basis. Everyone else, in the panic of the day, would have been mentally unprepared to think outside the box. Their lack of background knowledge would have made them susceptible to the "official line" being beamed at them from the media; and equally make them dismiss the Truth movement as crazy. Those who had been given parts to play - eg concerning Norad or the FAA - would not have comprehended what role they were playing (getting jets out of the weay, to let the hijackings proceed). Peter (3) Alan Sabrosky on "worker bees" & 9/11; history of "Catalytic Events" to enrage the US public Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 02:53:09 -0600 From: Alan Sabrosky <> Subject: Re: Pentagon classifies Evangelical Christians, and Catholics, as "domestic hate groups" Peter - I have not seen the DVD set, but will do so soon. My initial reaction is that any and all efforts to deflect attention away from the trinity of Israel-PNAC alumni-neocons is inherently deceptive. The rest of the detail may be very good, but I really cannot imagine a US court hauling Bush, Cheney & Rumsfeld into the dock - the legal maneuvering would take longer than any of them would live. Most of the "worker bees" would have no knowledge whatsoever of what was happening, and those in the know (or who later became aware of things and had the credibility (and media access, difficult to get) would understand that speaking out would means their own deaths, and probably that of their families as well - it is called the "death of generations." Those actually involved would likely be in "compartments" of activity, which is the way sensitive intelligence and "black" ops are normally conducted - and it does not take a lot of people. What is not generally understood is that this has happened often in US history - a "catalytic event" to enrage the US public and justify war. A few examples (I suspect there are others): (i) Spanish-American War: sinking of the USS Maine in Havana harbor made no sense for the Spanish to do, and seems to have been orchestrated by a coalition of the Hearst newspaper empire, corporations (e.g., United Fruit) interested in getting their fingers into the Spanish colonies, and Congressional war hawks wanting the US to have a colonial empire of its own -- dozens of people had to be in the know, and not a word reached the public for several decades; (ii) WWI: the British used unarmed passenger liners to carry munitions from Canada & the US to Britain and did so with the full knowledge and support of the US Government and the "Britain Firsters" in Congress and the media, which cooperated by keeping warnings from the German embassy out of its pages until after passengers had boarded the Lusitania, whose subsequent sinking by a U-boat with many US civilian fatalities provided the spark to bring the US into the war [LOTS of money made by some folks here], and scores of people had to know thus, yet not a word in public for a half century - and this is a biggie, because without the US Germany would have won, and there would not have been a place for a Hitler in a victorious German Empire, nor a Lenin in power for long in Russia; (iii) WWII: not only Pearl Harbor, but the outrage against Germany generated by the supposedly unprovoked sinking of a US destroyer (USS Reuben James) by a "dastardly" Nazi U-boat, with the public almost completely unaware that the US Navy had been escorting merchant ships carrying weapons and munitions to Britain and initiating attacks on German U-boats for months, until one German skipper just said in effect " *** it" and sank the destroyer - hundreds of people had to know, yet not a breath in the public for decades; (iv) Vietnam: Tonkin Gulf incident, which of course never happened, I am sure you know those details - again at least hundreds, and probably thousands of people had to know, and here some sense of that deception slithered out in the 1970s, but it is still not widely understood; and (v) Iraq-1 (Desert Storm): Saddam Hussein asked the US Ambassador to Iran, April Glaspie, what the US position would be if Iraq took action against Kuwait for a variety of reasons, she checked with Washington and told Saddam in essence that "disputes between Arab states were of no concern to the US" - he was doubtless astonished at how that unfolded, given his history of being aligned with the US in the 1980s against Iran, and my guess is that he was sucker-punched by the neo-cons in that Bush's administration who saw this as a golden opportunity to take out one of Israel's better-armed and more capable adversaries - here only a handful of people had to know about the deception. So both 9/11 and the 2003 attack on Iraq fit into a long-standing pattern of governmental deception, aligned with key elements in the media, corporate interests and at least the Congressional leadership. Dozens (perhaps hundreds) would have had to participate or be in the know. Interesting, no? Essentially, the pattern is that since the American people in general do not like to go to war, the "catalytic event" noted by PNAC as a pre-condition for outrage & war is the norm, not the exception - only the definition of the "usual suspects" changes. Alan (4) 9/11 And Israel: Alan Sabrosky's Shocking Press TV Interview Sami Joseph <> 14 September 2011 20:22 9/11 AND ISRAEL: ALAN SABROSKY'S SHOCKING PRESS TV INTERVIEW A 24:12min video at: Well worth watching. (5) September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor: A film by Massimo Mazzucco, reviewed by David Ray Griffin September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor: A film by Massimo Mazzucco Review by David Ray Griffin October 19, 2013 Information Clearing House There have been several good films and videos about 9/11. But the new film by award-winning film-maker Massimo Mazzucco is in a class by itself. For those of us who have been working on 9/11 for a long time, this is the film we have been waiting for. Whereas there are excellent films treating the falsity of particular parts of the official account, such as the Twin Towers or WTC 7, Mazzucco has given us a comprehensive documentary treatment of 9/11, dealing with virtually all of the issues. There have, of course, been films that treated the fictional official story as true. And there are films that use fictional stories to portray people’s struggles after starting to suspect the official story to be false. But there is no fiction in Mazzucco’s film – except in the sense that it clearly and relentlessly exposes every part of the official account as fictional. Because of his intent at completeness, Mazzucco has given us a 5-hour film. It is so fascinating and fast-paced that many will want to watch it in one sitting. But this is not necessary, as the film, which fills 3 DVDs, consists of 7 parts, each of which is divided into many short chapters. These 7 parts treat Air Defence, The Hijackers, The Airplanes, The Pentagon, Flight 93, The Twin Towers, and Building 7. In each part, after presenting facts that contradict the official story, Mazzucco deals with the claims of the debunkers (meaning those who try to debunk the evidence provided by the 9/11 research community). The Introduction, reflecting the film’s title, deals with 12 uncanny parallels between Pearl Harbor and September 11. The film can educate people who know nothing about 9/11 (beyond the official story), those with a moderate amount of knowledge about the various problems with the official story, and even by experts. (I myself learned many things.) Mazzucco points out that his film covers 12 years of public debate about 9/11. People who have been promoting 9/11 truth for many of these years will see that their labors have been well-rewarded: There is now a high-quality, carefully-documented film that dramatically shows the official story about 9/11 to be a fabrication through and through. This is truly the film we have been waiting for. == September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor is a 5 hour documentary on a set of three DVDs. Buy it at: (6) Guess Who Michael Moore's Agent Is? From: Jonathan Graham <> Date: 18.11.2010 07:33 PM Subject: Who is Michael Moore's Agent? July 31, 2004 Rahm Emmanuel, former Clinton adviser, current congressman from Illinois, staunch supporter of Israel, and suspected by many of being "Mega", the Mossad mole in the Clinton White House, has a brother, Ari Emmanuel, who just happens to be Michael Moore's agent. "Fahrenheit 9/11" is a powerful antiwar statement and needs to be supported for that reason. This coming election, we need to vote out the warhawks, both Republican and Democrat. However, I would like to ask Michael Moore a few questions regarding his implication that Saudi Arabia was behind 9-11. [...] (7) Video of Urban Moving Systems van {I think I watched this last year - Peter M.} Denver Media Service <> 15 November 2011 03:25 9/11 Vans.........."Splain This"........ (8) Greg Palast's father is a cousin of David Kimche, former deputy director of Mossad - Christopher Bollyn The fact is that Greg Palast's father is a first cousin of David Kimche, the British-born former deputy director of Israel's Mossad and director general of the foreign ministry under Yitzhak Shamir. == Then there are the people in the government and media who attack the 9-11 truth movement. In my latest piece I reveal that Greg Palast, a journalist who openly attacked Dr. Steven E. Jones as a "fraud", is himself closely related to the notorious Israeli Mossad chief David Kimche of Iran-Contra and other crimes. See the 7-minute video: "Greg Palast On 9/11 Controlled Demolition," YouTube, May 31, 2007 It is important to understand Palast's connection to Israeli intelligence because knowing who is behind the attacks on 9-11 truth reveals who is behind the deception that changed the world. As I explain in my Solving 9-11 books, Israeli intelligence and their Zionist agents in high places have been behind the 9-11 deception since Day One. Ask yourself, for whom have these high-level Zionist agents, like Michael Chertoff and Judge Hellerstein, covered up the truth of 9-11 and obstructed justice, if not for the state of Israel? My Solving 9-11 research and writing is of vital importance for Americans, and indeed all peace-loving people in the world, because understanding what really happened on 9-11 and who is behind it is essential to understanding the serious global problems we face today. To accept the deception of 9-11 is to be enslaved to a lie - a very dangerous lie. * * * * * [...] Comment: A reader wrote to me about my article "Greg Palast is Related to Mossad Chief David Kimche" suggesting that I was being too "harsh" on Palast by suggesting that his obnoxious hostility to Dr. Steven E. Jones and 9-11 truth could be connected to his family's close connection to Israeli intelligence. Greg Palast is openly hostile to Dr. Steven E. Jones and 9-11 truth. The fact is that Greg Palast's father is a first cousin of David Kimche, the British-born former deputy director of Israel's Mossad and director general of the foreign ministry under Yitzhak Shamir. This was the reader's comment in defense of Greg Palast: Greg Palast started out making a fuss about 9/11, and he stopped because he was going to be out of work if he kept it up. You, of all people, would understand that. It's not honorable, but a LOT of journalists have done the same, some of them top journalists. And, there's a decent excuse for it too: that their other work won't be taken seriously if they don't just go with the company line on that one. It sucks, but it doesn't make them Zionist devils. Bollyn Responds: The fact that Greg Palast supports the official pack of lies about 9-11 and is openly hostile to 9-11 truth and Dr. Steven E. Jones is a special case because of the Palast family connection to Israeli intelligence and the notorious Zionist terrorist Yitzhak Shamir. Shamir was one of the original planners of the 9-11 false-flag terrorism and David Kimche was close to Shamir from their days together in the Mossad. This is why Foreign Minister Shamir made Kimche director general of the foreign ministry under his command. [...] See: "Kimche joined the Mossad spy agency in the early 1950s, and was in essence one of the organization's founding fathers, among those who designed its doctrine and modus operandi. He was involved in just about every aspect of the Mossad over the course of his service, eventually reaching the position of deputy head of Mossad." Greg Palast spends a great deal of time in London, where David Kimche was born and where his family lives. Palast is fully aware of his family's relationship with Israel and the Mossad. Based on these facts, I can only conclude that Greg Palast is working as an Israeli propagandist/disinfo agent and this is the real reason for his obnoxious hostility to 9-11 truth and Dr. Steven E. Jones, which otherwise makes no sense. (9) Richard Gage 10-minute video (Dec 2012) links 9/11 to Police State, US invasions From: Keith Lampe <> Date: 31 December 2012 03:57 On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Daren <> wrote: This is the best 10-min video on 911 I've ever seen......SUCCINCT and TO-THE-POINT with FACTS. I feel this is very important as it has been the premise for the following: 1. US going to war with 2 countries. 2. Many of the draconian laws that have taken away common citizens' rights and freedoms. Please take the time to watch the video link below...... Architect Richard Gage reminds us that 9/11 is the excuse that is used by the government to wage aggressive wars around the world and restrict the freedom of its citizens. [Therefore, it is of utmost importance to recognize that the collapse of the three buildings on 9/11 was the result of controlled demolition. Here is a short, yet compelling, overview of the evidence.] YouTube Posted 2012 Dec 23 Click here for the video link: == also see 9/11: Explosive Evidence–Experts Speak Out (10) Radio interview with Christopher Bollyn: Odigo instant messages From: "Susie" <> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:50:04 +0000 Peter, I just interviewed Christopher Bollyn about his book 'Solving 9-11' and he talks about almost ALL of our computer systems and electronics run by Israel. Snowden exposed the ones monitoring Verizon for years. 7.00 The first story, about noon, that really struck me was Ted Koppel's. He said that the FBI was looking for five Middle-Eastern people who had been seen celebrating and photographing ... It turned out that this group of five people they were looking for turned out to be these Israeli agents. Two of them were known Mossad agents and the other three were {unclear} ... {next day} I got on the story about these Israelis - it was reported in New Jersey, in a little newspaper called The Berrigan Record, by a man named Paulo Lima. It was covered there, and right away I began to consider the possibility that it was an Israeli operation made to look like Muslims had done it. 8.20 ... that seemed to be the case, especially when another story came out about the Odigo instant messages that were sent to these 4,000 Israelis who should have been at work on 9/11, but didn't go to work on 9/11 because they had gotten this message on their cell phone, or their pager or their Blackberry whathaveyou, telling them not to go to work that day. The story about those 4,000 Israelis who didn't go to work that day, that actually was not Arab propaganda as people tried to portray it, that came from the Jerusalem Post, and the information came directly from the Israeli Foreign Ministry. It was an Israeli news story that was picked up by the Arabs because the Arabs found it very interesting. And when you consider that these people were forewarned about an attack - it was precise to the minute - these people got these messages as they were getting ready for breakfast, as they were getting out of bed - a couple of hours before - it must have been about 6 o'clock in the morning - they were getting these messages, and their pager was beeping, "Don't go to the World Trade Center today" - all in Hebrew, of course, "Don't go to the World Trade Center today, there's going to be an explosion there, stay home, give an excuse, don't go to work". (11) Haaretz repeats Odigo report "Odigo says workers were warned of attack". But no news from FBI, and no mention in US media Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:30:33 EDT From: Ha'aretz Daily repeats this today July 15, 2004 : Israeli workers were warned of 9/11 RePortersNoteBook Memo: What is going on here? Today Ha'aretz reprints it for the third time the same exact article. This Israeli daily reports the story with the SAME wording. There has been nothing added or subtracted. This article is over a year old. The Ha'aretz Daily in Israel is considered the equivalent of the New York Times in America. Yet no mention of this in the major media in the United States! =========== Haaretz Daily July 15, 2004 Odigo says workers were warned of attack {was at} {now at} By Yuval Dror Sep. 26, 2001 Odigo, the instant messaging service, says that two of its workers received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack on September 11 predicting the attack would happen, and the company has been cooperating with Israeli and American law enforcement, including the FBI, in trying to find the original sender of the message predicting the attack. Micha Macover, CEO of the company, said the two workers received the messages and immediately after the terror attack informed the company's management, which immediately contacted the Israeli security services, which brought in the FBI. "I have no idea why the message was sent to these two workers, who don't know the sender. It may just have been someone who was joking and turned out they accidentally got it right. And I don't know if our information was useful in any of the arrests the FBI has made," said Macover. Odigo is a U.S.-based company whose headquarters are in New York, with offices in Herzliya. As an instant messaging service, Odigo users are not limited to sending messages only to people on their "buddy" list, as is the case with ICQ, the other well-known Israeli instant messaging application. Odigo usually zealously protects the privacy of its registered users, said Macover, but in this case the company took the initiative to provide the law enforcement services with the originating Internet Presence address of the message, so the FBI could track down the Internet Service Provider, and the actual sender of the original message. (12) Newsbytes "Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC Attack" (27 September 2001) Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC Attack By Brian McWilliams, Newsbytes NEW YORK, NEW YORK, U.S.A., 27 September 2001, 11:48 AM CST Officials at instant-messaging firm Odigo confirmed today that two employees received text messages warning of an attack on the World Trade Center two hours before terrorists crashed planes into the New York landmarks. Citing a pending investigation by law enforcement, the company declined to reveal the exact contents of the message or to identify the sender. But Alex Diamandis, vice president of sales and marketing, confirmed that workers in Odigo's research and development and international sales office in Israel received a warning from another Odigo user approximately two hours prior to the first attack. Diamandis said the sender of the instant message was not personally known to the Odigo employees. Even though the company usually protects the privacy of users, the employees recorded the Internet protocol address of the message's sender to facilitate his or her identification. Soon after the terrorist attacks on New York, the Odigo employees notified their management, who contacted Israeli security services. In turn, the FBI was informed of the instant message warning. FBI officials were not immediately available for comment today. The Odigo service includes a feature called People Finder that allows users to seek out and contact others based on certain interests or demographics. Diamandis said it was possible that the attack warning was broadcast to other Odigo members, but the company has not received reports of other recipients of the message. In addition to operating its own messaging service network, Odigo has licensed its technology to over 100 service providers, portals, wireless carriers, and corporations, according to the company. Odigo is online at . Reported by Newsbytes, . (13) Bollyn on US Media ignoring Odigo text message warning of 9/11 Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World by Christopher Bollyn 2012 {p. 193} Israelis Forewarned Likewise, the reports about the Odigo text message warning of the attack at the World Trade Center were dropped into the media's memory hole. The message of warning, sent two hours before it occurred and precise to the minute, was sent via the Israeli-owned Odigo text messaging service and had been received by Odigo employees in Israel. Although the story was reported in the Israeli press and picked up by Brian McWilliams of Newsbytes on September 27, 2001, it was never followed-up and discussed by the major news networks. How did the news editors at the BBC, FOX, CNN, and the leading networks decide to censor certain aspects of 9-11? Let's look at this logically. The 9/11 attack was probably the biggest story these news editors had ever handled. Suffice it to say that the editorial decisions about how to cover 9-11 were made by the boss at the top. Any decision to omit or censor reports about explosions at the World Trade Center or indications of Israeli prior knowledge would have been made by the senior executive of each network. In the case of CNN it would have been Gerald M. Levin, the CEO of Time Warner who ac {p. 194} quired Turner Broadcasting in 1997. (Levin unexpectedly announced his resignation in December 2001, less than three months after 9- 11.) At FOX News the top decision maker would have been Rupert Murdoch, CEO of News Corporation. At ABC News it would have been Michael D. Eisner, CEO of Disney, the network's parent company. Were the media moguls Murdoch, Levin, and Eisner involved in the 9-11 conspiracy? How did they know that certain aspects of the event needed to be suppressed? Their networks have continued to suppress important informatfon about 9-11 since 200 1. It can be said that they have been actively involved in a conspiracy to cover-up the truth. Who is behind this cover-up by the media? What hidden hand would be able to communicate with these men and influence them to suppress important reports and evidence from 9-11? Arnon Milchan - Mossad's Man in the Middle If one considers the evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of 9-11 the Odigo text messages and the five arrested Mossad agents, for example, as indicative of Israeli involvement in the crime, the nature of the cover-up is obvious. The "hidden hand" suppressing the information about 9-11 would have to be a high-level person in the Israeli political-military establishment who has very close relations with media kingpins like Murdoch, Levin, and Eisner. Arnon Milchan is such a person. Could Milchan be the hidden hand? "Kingpins like Warner Brothers' Gerald Levin and Disney's Michael Eisner are quick to return his calls," the American journalist Ann Louise Bardach wrote about Milchan in her article "The Last Tycoon" in April 2000. {p. 195} While millions of Americans have seen his films, such as Pretty Woman and JFK, very few know that Arnon Milchan is a "best friend" of Shimon Peres, the Israeli president and godfather of Israel's nuclear arsenal. Milchan's close friendship with Peres, the man who oversaw the illegal development of Israel's nuclear weapon program, is key to understanding Milchan's career as an undercover operative, weapons procurer, and film producer. The fact that Milchan, the Hollywood producer, has been Israel's "foremost weapons procurer" for decades, brokering deals for "everything from nuclear triggers to rocket fuel to guidance systems' " is seldom mentioned in the U.S. news media. This is probably due to the fact that Milchan is also a "best friend" and business partner of Rupert Murdoch. He is also a friend and business partner with Levin (Warner Brothers) and Eisner. "I consider him one of my best friends," Milchan said about Murdoch, "and I think vice versa. We're having a ball. He's a very cool guy." In 1997, after - a six-year relationship with Warner Brothers, Milchan became a partner with Murdoch, selling him twenty percent of his film company, New Regency Productions, for $200 million. Murdoch also invested another $30 million in Regency Television. Today, Murdoch's equity partnership with Milchan is close to fifty percent. "Milchan's deal with Fox also assures him a level of financial security," Bardach wrote. "With Murdoch's $200 million investment and a subsequent $600 million line of credit from a team of banks led by Chase Manhattan, Milchan is well into mogul territory. "Milchan's tony offices occupy most of Building 12, right next door to the Executive Building on the Fox lot," Bardach wrote. "And it is from this seat of power that Milchan is building an entertainment empire that could one day rival Murdoch's.' (14) September 11: Inside Job or Mossad Job? by Laurent Guyénot September 11: Inside Job or Mossad Job? by Laurent Guyénot Israel’s role in the events of September 11, 2001—that shape the 21st century—is the subject of bitter controversy, or rather a real taboo even within the 9/11 Truth Movement, causing the ostracism of the man who dared to broach the subject, Thierry Meyssan. Most advocacy groups, mobilized behind the slogan "9/11 was an Inside Job," remain discreet regarding the evidence involving the secret services of the Jewish state. Laurent Guyénot focuses on certain compelling—though grossly under reported—facts and analyzes the mechanisms of denial. VOLTAIRE NETWORK | 10 JULY 2013 While Israel’s role in the destabilization of the world post-September 11 is becoming increasingly clear, the idea that a faction of Likudniks, aided by their allies embedded in the U.S. State apparatus, are responsible for the false flag operation of September 11 is becoming more difficult to suppress, and some individuals have the courage to state so publicly. Francesco Cossiga, President of Italy between 1985 and 1992, declared on 30 November 2007 to the daily Corriere della Sera: “From areas around the Palazzo Chigi, nerve centre of direction of Italian intelligence, it is noted that the non-authenticity of the video is supported by the fact that Osama bin Laden in it ’confessed’ that Al Qaeda was responsible for the 9/11 attack on the Twin Towers in New York. However, all of the democratic areas of America and of Europe, with the Italian center-left in the forefront, now know full well that the disastrous attack was planned and executed by the American CIA and Mossad with the help of the Zionist world to falsely incriminate Arabic countries and to persuade the Western Powers to intervene in Iraq and Afghanistan [1]." Alan Sabrosky, former professor at the U.S. Army War College and the U.S. Military Academy, did not hesitate to proclaim his belief that September 11 is a "classical operation orchestrated by Mossad" carried out with accomplices within the United States government, and his voice has been forcefully echoed by some U.S. Army veterans sites who are disgusted by the vile war that they were forced to wage on behalf of the September 11 lie or that of the weapons of mass destruction of Saddam Hussein [2]. The arguments in favor of the Mossad hypothesis are not only related to the reputation of the world’s most powerful secret service, which a report by the U.S. Army School for Advanced Military Studies (quoted by the Washington Times on the eve of September 11th), described as "wildcat, ruthless and cunning. Able to carry out an attack on U.S. forces and disguise it as an act committed by Palestinians/Arabs [3]." The Mossad involvement, together with other Israeli elite units, is made evident by a number of little known facts. The dancing Israelis {inset} The eBook by Hicham Hamza, "Israel and September 11: The Great Taboo" (2013) brings together the case against Israel, with impeccable precision and all easily accessible sources. {end inset} {Note: Hicham's ebook is in French:ël-11-Septembre-grand-tabou-ebook/dp/B00BB1HTHY/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1374478008&sr=1-1} How many of us know, for example, that the only people arrested on the same day in connection with the terrorist attacks of September 11 are Israelis [4]? This information was reported the very next day by journalist Paulo Lima in The Record, the newspaper of Bergen County in New Jersey, according to police sources. Immediately after the first impact on the North Tower, three individuals were seen by several witnesses on the roof of a van parked at Liberty State Park in Jersey City, "celebrating” and “jumping up and down,” and photographing themselves with the twin towers in the background. They then moved their van to another parking spot in Jersey City, where other witnesses saw them display the same ostentatious celebrations. The police immediately issued a BOLO alert (be-on-the-look-out): "Vehicle possibly related to the terrorist attack in New York. 2000 white Chevrolet van with New Jersey plates and an ’Urban Moving Systems’ sign at the back, was seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into the World Trade Center. Three individuals with the van were seen celebrating after the initial impact and the explosion that followed [5]." The van was stopped by police a few hours later, with five young Israelis aboard: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari. Physically forced out of the vehicle and pinned to the ground, the driver, Sivan Kurzberg, launched this strange sentence: "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem [6].” Police sources who informed Paulo Lima were convinced of the involvement of the Israelis in the morning’s attacks: "There were maps of the city in the van with some of the points highlighted. It looked like they knew [...] they knew what would happen when they were at Liberty State Park [7]. Passports of various nationalities, nearly 6000 dollars in cash and open airline tickets to travel abroad were also found on them. The Kurzberg brothers were formally identified as Mossad agents. The five Israelis worked officially for a moving company named Urban Moving Systems, whose employees were mostly Israelis. "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me [8]," stated one of the few non-Israeli workers to The Record. On September14, after receiving a visit from the police, the business owner, Dominik Otto Suter, left the country for Tel Aviv. The information disclosed by The Record, confirmed by the police report, was taken on by investigative sites such as the Wayne Madsen Report (September 14, 2005) and Counterpunch (February 7, 2007). It was also reported in some main media as well but in a way that minimized its scope: the New York Times (November 21, 2001) failed to mention the nationality of the individuals, just like Fox News and the Associated Press. The Washington Post (November 23, 2001) said they were Israelis, but passed over in silence their apparent foreknowledge of the event. However, The Forward (March 15, 2002), a magazine of the New York Jewish community, revealed that, according to an anonymous U.S. intelligence source, Urban Moving Systems was a Mossad undercover unit (which did not prevent it from receiving a federal loan of 498,750 dollars, as shown by the tax records)] [9]. The FBI conducted an investigation contained in a 579 page report, partially declassified in 2005 (it will be completely declassified in 2035). Freelance journalist Hisham Hamza analyzed this in detail in his book Israel and September 11: The Great Taboo. It shows a number of damning elements. First, the photos taken by these young Israelis actually show them in attitudes of celebration before the North Tower on fire: "They smiled, they hugged and they gave each other high fives." To explain this, stakeholders said they were simply delighted "that the United States should now take steps to stop terrorism in the world" (although, at this point, a majority of people thought the crashes were an accident rather than an actd of terrorism). Moreover, at least one witness saw them positioned at 8:00, before an aircraft struck the first tower, while others certify that they were already taking pictures five minutes later, which is confirmed by their photos. A former employee confirmed to the FBI, the fanatically pro-Israeli and anti-American atmosphere that reigned in the company, even attributing to its director, Dominik Otto Suter, these words: "Give us twenty years and we will seize and destroy your media and your country." The five arrested Israelis were in contact with another moving company called Classic International Movers, four employees of which were interviewed separately for their links with the nineteen suspected hijackers. One of them had called "an individual in South America with genuine links to Islamic militants in the Middle East." Finally, "a sniffer dog gave a positive result for the presence of traces of explosives in the vehicle [10]." As Hamza notes, the report’s conclusion is thought provoking: the FBI informs the local police detaining the suspects that, "the FBI has no further interest in investigating the prisoners and ’appropriate immigration procedures should be initiated [11]." A letter from the federal Immigration and Naturalization Service in fact shows that the FBI management recommended the termination of the investigation on September 24, 2001. However, the five Israelis spent 71 days in prison in Brooklyn, during which they refused, then failed several lie detector tests. They were subsequently repatriated under the simple charges of visa violations. We must finally mention an important detail of this affair, which may provide an additional explanation for the exuberant behavior of these young Israelis: some witnesses specify in their calls to the police, that people rejoicing on the roof of their van seemed to be "Arabs" or "Palestinians". In particular, shortly after the collapse of the towers, an anonymous call to police in Jersey City, reported on the same day by NBC News, described "a white van with two or three guys on the inside, they look like Palestinians and they are circling around a building", one of them "is mixing things and he has a ’sheikh’s outfit on. [...] He is dressed like an Arab [12]." All indications are that these individuals were precisely the five Israelis arrested later. Two hypotheses come to mind: either our false movers are actually engaged in a staged action to appear as Arabs/Palestinians, or the witness or witnesses who described them as such were accomplices. As in the other case, it is clear that their goal was to initiate media rumors that Muslims had been spotted rejoicing not only for the attacks, but also for having foreknowledge. The information was actually broadcast on some radio stations at noon, and on NBC News in the afternoon. I personally lean toward the second hypothesis (informants as accomplices rather than true Arabs in disguise) because the police report makes no mention of any exotic clothing found in the van, but especially because the informant cited above, who emphasized the clothing details, seems to have wanted to mislead the police about the exact location of the van; the latter was intercepted only because the police, instead of being satisfied with just this location, blocked all bridges and underground tunnels between New Jersey and New York. But the important thing is this: If the Israelis had not been arraigned in the late afternoon, the story probably would have made headlines with the title: The Dancing Arabs. Instead, it was completely suppressed and was circulated only confidentially under the title The dancing Dancing Israelis, or The Highfivers. [...] In 1986, the Mossad tried to make believe that a series of terrorist orders were transmitted from Libya to various Libyan embassies around the world. According to former agent Victor Ostrovsky (By Way of Deception, 1990), the Mossad used a special communication system, labeled "Trojan Horse," established by commandos inside enemy territory. The system acts as a relay station for false transmissions sent from an Israeli ship and immediately reissued on a frequency used by the Libyan state. As the Mossad had hoped, the NSA caught and deciphered the transmissions, which were interpreted as evidence that the Libyans supported terrorism, reports that Mossad came opportunely to confirm. Israel relied on Reagan’s promise of retaliation against any country caught in the act of supporting terrorism. The Americans fell into the trap and dragged with them the British and the Germans: April 14, 1986, one hundred and sixty U.S. aircraft dropped over sixty tons of bombs on Libya, targeting mainly airports and military bases. Among the civilian casualties on the Libyan side was Gaddafi’s adopted daughter, aged four. The strike torpedoed a deal for the release of US hostages held in Lebanon, allowing Hezbollah to continue as public enemy number one in the eyes of the West.


  By: DOTT JOSE on Giovedì 16 Gennaio 2014 16:19

Non abbiamo mai avuto sovranità, sempre costretti in questa camicia di forza chiamata NATO, sempre piegati al volere degli imperialisti, Dai pesanti condizionamenti imposti alla ricostruzione post-bellica dal Piano Marshall in funzione anticomunista e antioperaia, all’assassinio di Enrico Mattei, per conto delle Sette sorelle petrolifere angloamericane. Dal ruolo di collegamento tra mafia, Vaticano e Wall Street svolto dal banchiere piduista Sindona, nominato uomo dell’anno nel 1974 appena tre mesi prima della bancarotta, dall’ambasciatore americano in Italia, alla politica di austerità imposta dal FMI in occasione del prestito chiesto dal Governo Andreotti nel 1976. fuori dalla UE Fuori dalla NATO Fuori dall Euro !



  By: foibar on Mercoledì 15 Gennaio 2014 11:21

interessanti interviste

Non l’unificazione per unire, ma l’unione per disintegrare - yamamoto  

  By: yamamoto on Domenica 12 Gennaio 2014 01:32

(tratto da, cita un libro delle edizione Effepi, Blondet... e Ida Magli) ------- ^Disintegrazione mirata delle culture#^ La disintegrazione delle culture nazionali, delle identità è un passaggio obbligatorio. Per usare le parole del sociologo Randolph Bourne, la disintegrazione culturale crea “orde di uomini e di donne senza patria spirituale, dei fuorilegge culturali senza gusto, senza norme e senza direttive se non quelle della massa” (1) Il liberismo viene esaltato in tutti gli ambiti (economica, finanza, politica, religione…) come massima espressione di democrazia e libertà, ma l’uomo delle società liberali, perde il suo status di cittadino, perde la sua individualità (intesa come espressione spirituale), scivolando verso la condizione di massa, e in questa si perde l’unicità: siamo tutti uno. Vogliono farci credere che “siamo tutti uguali”, anche se, alcuni sono più uguali di altri. ^Non l’unificazione per unire, ma l’unione per disintegrare!#^ L’omogeneizzazione dei popoli europei L’antropologa Ida Magli è precisa sullo scopo finale della globalizzazione: “il Governo unico mondiale. La riduzione all’uguaglianza di comportamento per tutti i popoli: una sola lingua, una sola religione, una sola moneta, una sola identità, una sola cultura, un solo Stato. La “guida” sottostante a quella dei governanti sembrerebbe massonica, in quanto questi sono fin dall’inizio gli ideali massonici”. (4) (2)Con il Trattato di Schengen hanno eliminato i confini, e ogni Stato ha sempre avuto confini. Uno Stato non è tale se non possiede un determinato territorio. (5) “L’Italia - continua la dottoressa Magli - non è più uno Stato. Cosa che del resto, è lo scopo primario dell’unificazione europea: l’eliminazione degli Stati”. Moltissime persone, soffocate e strozzate da un sistema parassitario disumanizzante che sta lentamente stringendo il cappio intorno al collo di milioni di persone, vogliono sognare, allontanarsi dai propri problemi quotidiani (economici, sociali, religiosi, lavorativi, salutari, ecc.) e il Sistema ci accontenta: crea film di avventura, saghe fantascientifiche, romantici strappalacrime, eroi che salvano il mondo, fiction, serie televisive infinite che hanno proprio questo intento: staccarci dalla realtà e tenerci il più a lungo possibile lontano. Il punto è che non lo fanno per il nostro bene… Ci mettono le ali ai piedi, ci fanno volare e sognare a occhi aperti, e nel frattempo, oltre a spillarci i soldi (creando bisogni, culture e mode), i nostri veri problemi di tutti i giorni, non si sono mossi di un millimetro, anzi si sono nel frattempo accumulati… Modificano e manipolano la realtà, la impastano per i propri tornaconti, dandoci infine un polpettone di mezze verità misto a bugie. Gli Stati Uniti d’America sono un paese giovanissimo se confrontato con il Vecchio Continente europeo; un paese formato da un miscuglio di gruppi etnici e individui tra i più diversi al mondo. In America non esiste alcun principio di nazionalità, e il poeta tedesco Nikolau Lenau è molto esplicito in questo, descrivendo l’americano come una persona che “non conosce altro che i denaro; egli non ha altra idea. Di conseguenza lo Stato non è un’istituzione spirituale ed etica, ma soltanto una convenzione materiale”. (3) Purtroppo anche qui da noi in Europa sta avvenendo una simile strategia: le potentissime massonerie stanno unificando i paesi europei, cancellando le differenze sociali, religiose, culturali, storiche, economiche e monetarie. Il tutto sotto l’ombrello e la bandiera dell’euro. American dream Dal XX secolo gli americani si sentono il centro del mondo, la potenza suprema e il modello da esportare, magari con bombe al fosforo a frammentazione e uranio impoverito. La loro convinzione non dipende solo dal fatto che possiedono l’esercito più potente al mondo, ma nella visione e convinzione che la loro società è la realizzazione di tutti i sogni degli altri popoli: giustizia, libertà, democrazia, ricchezza, ecc. La realtà è esattamente il contrario, ma il popolo americano, lobotomizzato e decerebrato da decenni di propaganda radiotelevisiva crede ciecamente in tale modello. La mission ultima dell’Impero statunitense è il soddisfacimento dei bisogni materiali, tanto sognati ed osannati dalle grandi masse. Le pellicole di celluloide e la televisione, come detto prima, rappresentano il narcotico sociale perfetto: anestetizzano le menti, fanno evadere dai problemi di tutti i giorni, fanno sognare lo spettatore grazie a illusioni irrealizzabili, trasformando la finzione in realtà e la realtà in finzione. Una realtà de facto inventata, creata ad arte e impiantata nei cervelli grazie all’immenso potere della suggestionabilità delle immagini e dei suoni. Quello che vediamo al cinema, per il cervello, è più reale della realtà stessa, e siccome quello che si vede è più bello e meno doloroso, viene accettato con più facilità. Lo schermo diviene una specie di bypass cerebrale che va direttamente a colpire l’inconscio dello spettatore (6) La funzione della televisione viene ben descritta nel monologo di Howard Beale, interpretato da Peter Finch, nel film di Sidney Lumet: “Network” (da noi “Quinto Potere”) del 1976. .... “Meno del 3% di voialtri legge libri, meno del 15% di voi legge giornali o riviste. Perché l'unica verità che conoscete è quella che ricevete alla tv. Attualmente, c'è da noi un'intera generazione che non ha mai saputo niente che non fosse trasmesso alla tv. La tv è la loro Bibbia, la suprema rivelazione! La tv può creare o distruggere presidenti, papi, primi ministri. La tv è la più spaventosa, maledettissima forza di questo mondo senza Dio. E poveri noi se cadesse nelle mani degli uomini sbagliati… Perché questa società è ora nella mani della CCA, la Communication Corporation of America, e quando una tra le più grandi corporazioni del mondo controlla la più efficiente macchina per una propaganda fasulla e vuota, in questo mondo senza Dio, io non so quali altre cazzate verranno spacciate per verità, qui! Quindi ascoltatemi. Ascoltatemi! La televisione non è la verità! La televisione è un maledetto parco di divertimenti, la televisione è un circo, un carnevale, una troupe viaggiante di acrobati, cantastorie, ballerini, cantanti, giocolieri, fenomeni da baraccone, domatori di leoni, giocatori di calcio! Ammazzare la noia è il nostro solo mestiere. Da noi non potrete mai ottenere la verità. Vi diremo tutto quello che volete sentire mentendo senza vergogna. Vi diremo qualsiasi cazzata vogliate sentire! Noi commerciamo illusioni, niente di tutto questo è vero! Ma voi tutti ve ne state seduti là, giorno dopo giorno, notte dopo notte, di ogni età, razza, fede. Conoscete soltanto noi. Già cominciate a credere alle illusioni che fabbrichiamo qui. Cominciate a credere che la tv è la realtà, e che le vostre vite sono irreali. Voi fate tutto quello che la tv vi dice: vi vestite come in tv, mangiate come in tv, tirate su bambini come in tv, persino pensate come in tv! Questa è pazzia di massa! Siete tutti matti! In nome di Dio, siete voialtri la realtà. Noi, siamo le illusioni. Quindi spegnete i vostri televisori, spegneteli ora. Spegneteli immediatamente! Spegneteli e lasciateli spenti! ... Howard Beale, da buon commentatore televisivo, parla dei rischi insiti della tv, ma il suo discorso si può allargare ed estendere al cinema e ad ogni altro mezzo di comunicazione. Ha proprio ragione: la tv e il cinema non sono la realtà, sono strumenti nelle mani dei controllori che sfornano falsità, illusioni e sogni. Sfruttano le conoscenza profonde dell’animo umano, della psiche, dell’inconscio e della psicologia sociale delle masse, per veicolare quello che vogliono che noi sentiamo e vediamo. Jack Warner, uno dei padri della potentissima Warner già agli inizi degli anni Trenta aveva ben chiaro la potenza della macchina propagandistica del cinema: “i film possono e devono giocare una parte importantissima nella crescita culturale ed educativa dell’umanità. Noi dobbiamo sforzarci di fare pellicole che procurino alla gente qualcosa di più di una semplice, oziosa, ora o due di divertimento”. Tutti i grandi tycoon dei mezzi mediatici avevano compreso fin da sùbito, che i film non rappresentavano solo uno strumento di puro intrattenimento, ma potevano plasmare la società, dare forma alle menti di milioni di persone. L’invasione mondiale del cinema a stelle e strisce Nel 1913 negli USA ci sono 20.000 sale di proiezione che vendono 5 miliardi di biglietti ogni anno, portando nelle casse delle industrie 300 milioni di dollari. Gli Stati Uniti, con circa 120 milioni di abitanti, registrano ogni settimana 110 milioni di spettatori. Nel 1955 i film americani giungono ad occupare il 75% del tempo-proiezione in Belgio, Danimarca, il 70% in Grecia, Finlandia, il 63% dell’Europa occidentale. Nel 1993 tali percentuali sono ancora più incredibili: l’americanizzazione del mondo, va avanti, soprattutto dopo la Seconda Guerra Mondiale a ritmo esponenziale. Ed è soprattutto qui in Europa che l’invasione hollywoodiana si fa sentire alla grande: quasi il 60% dei programmi televisivi e circa l’80% dei film sono infatti di produzione statunitense. Il finto antirazzismo Il soggetto principale di migliaia di chilometri di pellicole hollywoodiane è non a caso l’antirazzismo. Se questa potrebbe a prima vista apparire una funzione utile, l’antirazzismo americano non mira a proteggere le differenze razziali, mira invece all’annullamento delle stesse razze, del diverso, come espressione non solo fisica (negro, indiano, ebreo, giallo, ecc.), ma anche come sistema di valori. In pratica è la negazione radicale del diverso. Esattamente la copia di quello che hanno messo in pratica qui in Europa, con la nascita dell’euro: cancellando la diversità, l’economie, la storie e le monete nazionali, siamo tutti uguali, perché è proprio nell’uguaglianza che avviene l’assimilazione. Il modello razziale, cioè il modello di valori da imporre a tutti gli altri nel mondo, vuoi con la forza e la conquista (guerre), vuoi con la manipolazione mentale (cinema e televisione) è quello WASP: White Anglo Saxon Protestants. Loro conservano la propria identità, perché loro assorbono, o meglio, omologano le altre razze. Le major hollywoodiane Le principali e miliardarie industrie filmiche, vengono chiamate anche major e sono rappresentate da cinque colossi Five Biggest o Big Five: Paramount (Zukor), Warner Bros (Warner), Loew-MGM (Mayer), Twentieth Century-Fox (William Fox) e RKO; e da tre un po’ più piccoli, ma sempre potenti, Three Smaller o Little Three: Universal (Laemmle), Columbia (F.lli Cohen) e United Artists. Paramount Cronologicamente, la prima delle major, per così dire, di “prima classe”, è la Paramount, casa fondata e diretta per vent’anni dall’ebreo Adolph Zukor, nato nel 1873 a Ricse in Ungheria, figlio di un pellicciaio benestante. Ecco in sintesi il pensiero di Zuckor: “ve lo dico come ungherese, come ebreo, come artista e come filosofo. Gli uomini vogliono anche sognare. Hanno bisogno dei loro sogni. Ebbene, noi fabbricheremo dei sogni, sogni in serie, sogni divertenti, che costano poco. Voi mi prestate 5000 dollari e in pochi anni ne avrete 500.000. Osservate la gente, vuole delle illusioni”. La gente vuole illusioni, paga per avere le illusioni e loro li creano. Il potere commerciale della Paramount è sempre stato basato sul sistema del blocco (block bookin, noleggio in blocco), cioè un sistema che costringe i gestori delle sale ad affittare non il solo film desiderato, ma una lista completa di pellicole. Nel 1929 la casa, acquista dalla seconda grande compagnia radiofonica CBS, il 49% delle azioni in cambio di azioni Paramount del valore di 5 milioni di dollari. Nel 1935, dopo la bancarotta, Leonard Goldenson riorganizza la major come Paramount Pictures Inc., la cui presidenza viene assunta dal banchiere John Otterson e il capo studio è Emanuel Cohen. Nell’ottobre del 1966 la Paramount viene assorbita da un conglomerato industriale-finaziario: la Gulf & Western Industries, e un accordo con la MCA, proprietaria della Universal Films, porta alla fondazione della CIC, Cinema International Corporation, per la distribuzione di film sul mercato internazionale, che diviene in breve la prima casa del settore, arrivando a gestire fino ad un terzo del mercato complessivo. Nel settembre 1994 la Paramount Communcations viene comperata per 10 miliardi di dollari dal gruppo televisivo di Boston, Viacom, proprietaria dei canali MTV. L’obiettivo è formare, dopo Time-Warner, News Corporation e Walt Disney, il quarto colosso dell’entertainment americano. Il trust Viacom-Paramount International è un conglomerato che controlla 12 stazioni televisive, 14 radio, 3593 negozi d videocassette (Blockbuster) e 1927 sale cinematografiche. Nel settembre 1999 Viacom acquista la CBS (14 tv e 160 radio) per 34,5 miliardi di dollari arrivando a controllare e gestire 200 siti internet, MTV, 138 reti via cavo, 200 canali tv tradizionali e 144 emittenti radio. Universal Carl Laemmle emigrato negli States dalla Germania, ha fatto di tutto: impiegato in un negozio all’ingrosso e poi in un magazzino, contabile di un gioielliere e poi di un mercante di bestiame, venditore di quotidiani domenicali per arrotondare le entrate. A Chicago nel 1906 apre il suo primo teatro, dopo tre anni, è il più potente distributore di pellicole filmine degli Stati Uniti. La sua nuova società inizia una dura lotta giudiziaria contro il Trust di Edison che si concluderà nel 1915 con la sconfitta e lo smembramento dell’oligopolio fondato dall’inventore della lampadina. A marzo del 1910 è proprio il tedesco ad imprimere una svolta storica nella cinematografia mondiale, inaugurando l’era dello star system. Fino ad allora infatti gli attori e le attrici erano poco noti al grande pubblico. Nasce così anche il gossip. Nel 1912 aiutato dal cognato Isadore Bernstein, Laemmle fonda la Universal Pipe Fitting o Universal Film Manufacturing Company che poi diventerà Universal Studios e la sede viene trasferita a Hollywood. Nel 1990 il conglomerato nipponico Matsu *** a Electric Industrial rileva la MCA e l’Universal Pictures per 6,5 miliardi di dollari. Successivamente, per 5,7 miliardi di dollari il controllo passa alla Seagram del canadese Edgar Bronfoman e poi Bronfman Jr che già possiede il 19% del gruppo Time-Warner. Infine nel giugno 2000, per fronteggiare i tre colossi CBS-Viacom (Paramount), NewsCorp-Bertelsmann (Twentieh) e AOL-TimeWarner (Warner Bros), la Seagram (Universal) si fonde con Vivendi, il maggior gruppo francese Vivendi-Universal. 20th Century-Fox Wilhelm Fried, diventato successivamente William Fox, è nato nel 1879 a Tulchva in Ungheria. Dopo aver lavorato come foderatore di cappelli per la Solomon & Son, con l’aiuto del finanziare Sol Brill, acquista il suo primo locale e nel giro di poco tempo arriva a possedere 25 locali di proiezione cinematografica. La ditta Fox inizia nel 1913 a produrre cortometraggi a New York e nel New Jersey. Girati una cinquantina di film, nel 1916 si trasferisce nell’Eldorado californiano, Hollywood. La Fox Film Corporation diviene il primo conglomerato filmico e nel 1927 conta mille sale di proiezione. Nello stesso anno la Fox acquista la maggioranza azionaria della Loew’s Incorporated, la società finanziaria tramite la quale ottiene il controllo della MGM, costituendo la nuova Fox-Loew la più grande società dell’industria del cinema. Nel 1935, dopo la grande Depressione, la Fox si fonde con la 20th Century Pictures Incorporated. MGM: Metro Goldwyn Mayer Louis (Lazar) Burt Mayer dopo aver commercializzato in rottami di ferro, nel 1912 si associa con Ben Stern e con Adolph Mayer per costituire la Louis B. Mayer Film Company con sede a Boston. Mayer, proprietario di una catena di locali diffusa soprattutto nel New England, entra nel grande giro della distribuzione. Nel frattempo Samuel Goldwyn, che ha lasciato la Paramount nel 1919 fonda con i fratelli Edgar e Arch Selwyn la Goldwyn Pictures. Il terzo polo della futura MGM è Marcus Loew e la sua Loew’s Incorporaed, società di distribuzione che inizia acquistando la Metro Pictures Nel 1924 Loew fonda con Goldwyn la Metro-Goldwyn Productions e si trasferisce a Hollywood. A maggio dello stesso anno nasce la famosissima MGM, Metro Goldwyn Mayer che diventerà il complesso cinematografico più grande del mondo: una stazione ferroviaria, un porto e anche una giungla. Ma quello che ha caratterizzato la MGM rispetto le altre major, era la presenza delle star (Greta Garbo, Clark Gable, Spencer Tracy, Joan Crawford, Judy Garland e moltissimi altri). Tra il 1964 e il 1967 uno dei maggiori azionisti Philph Levin, vende le sue azioni che vengono comperate da Edgar Bronfman della Universal, dando il via alla dissoluzione della major. Nel 1969 la MGM finisce nella mani del finanziere armeno Kirk Kerkorian e questo nel 1986 la cede a Ted Turner per 1,5 miliardi di dollari. Ad acquistare la grande industria produttrice di sogni è nel 1991 l’italiano Giancarlo Parretti, accompagnato e aiutato dal finanziere Floro Fiorini, noto alle cronache per lo scandalo del Banco Ambrosiano e della loggia P2. Per concludere le vicissitudini della major, nel 2004 spiazzando la Time-Warner, la Sony Corporation rileva la MGM per ben 5 miliardi di dollari, accaparrandosi così di fatto una libreria di 4100 pellicole, tra le quali ben 200 Premi Oscar. Warner Bros La Warner Bros, prende appunto il nome dai fratelli Warner: Sam (Samuel), Jack, Albert (Abraham) ed Harry. Dopo aver iniziato la loro attività nel 1917 con una piccola sala di proiezione, divengono in breve direttori della catena teatrale First National e fondano la vera e propria compagnia. Nel 1923 acquistando la Viagraph Company, proprietaria di un brevetto di registrazione sonora che accompagna i film muti, la Warner diviene, grazie alla rivoluzione sonora, una tra le più affermate major di Hollywood. Nel 1989 la Warner si fonde con il gruppo editoriale Time generando un mostro gigantesco Time-Warner, il più potente conglomerato multimediale del mondo. Columbia Possiamo dire che è la prima delle cosiddette piccole major, anche se per piccolo non si vuole sminuirne la portata. La Columbia deriva dalla Cohn Brothers e poi CBS Film Sales Corporation, di proprietà di Harry Cohn e dal fratello Jack (derivato da Jacob). Dopo varie vicissitudini, negli anni Settanta per sopravvivere alla crisi, deve vendere gli studios e fondersi con la Warner. Negli anni Ottanta passa alla Coca-Cola ma è solo nel 1989 che la Columbia Pictures si fonda con la Tri-Star Pictures per formare il Motion Pictures Group. Nel 1991 la compagnia cambia nome in Sony Pictures Entertainment con Columbia e Tri-Star come società sussidiarie di produzione filmica. RKO L’ultima delle grandi case è nata nel 1928 col nome di Radio-Keith-Orpheum Radio Pictures anche se le sue origini risalgono agli inizi del secolo. Sorge dalla Film Booking Offices of America Incorporated, dalla KAO Keith-Albee-Orpheum Corporation e dalla RCA Radio Corporation of America del potentissimo gruppo Rockefeller. “Al termine del XX secolo Hollywood resta un’industria con una spiccata sfumatura etnica. Praticamente tutti i capi dei maggiori studi sono ebrei. Gli sceneggiatori, i produttori e i misura minore i registi sono ebrei in una quantità sproporzionata; un recente studio li ha indicati presenti in oltre il 59% delle pellicole di maggior successo”. J.J. Goldberg, Jewish Power, 1996 La cinematografia è sempre stata, assieme alla cugina più giovane televisione, i veicoli principali di controllo delle masse. Proprio per questo motivo, ogni Regime che si rispetti, ha sempre ingabbiato e gestito i mezzi di comunicazione di massa. I mass media, cartacei, radiofonici, cibernetici e visivi non solo giocano un ruolo fondamentale nella modifica e manipolazione della percezione della realtà, ma possono innescare e accelerare determinati processi cognitivi e fisiologici che conducono l’uomo direttamente nelle prigioni coercitive del cosiddetto Nuovo Ordine Mondiale: il cosiddetto mondialismo. Chi controlla questi sistemi, ha il potere di vita e di morte su centinaia di milioni, per non dire miliardi di individui. I finanziatori I veri ^padroni di questi oligopoli multimediali sono sempre stati e lo sono ancora oggi, i grandi imperi finanziari:....#^ - Rockefeller (agente statunitense dell’impero europeo dei Rothschild); - Morgan (che dopo la morte del fondatore JP Morgan e il Glass-Steagall Act del 1933 che scinde le banche di deposito da quelle di affari, l’istituto si biforca in JP Morgan e Morgan Stanley & Co.); - Kuhn, Loeb & Co.; La seconda metà dell’Ottocento è proprio il periodo basilare nella nascita delle principali lobbies e industrie del pianeta. Nascono non solo le imprese cinematografiche, ma praticamente sorgono le più importanti industrie di ogni genere: farmaceutiche, acciaio, agro-alimentari, petrolifere-energetiche, ecc. La nascita di questi colossi è stata permessa dalle banche d’affari dell’epoca che hanno finanziato. Quali erano queste banche? Risponde Carrol Quigley, docente di storia a Princeton e Harvard: “i nomi di talune di queste banche ci sono famigliari, e dovrebbero esserlo anche di più. Sono i Baring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Seligman, Speyer, Mirabaud, Mallet, Lazard, e soprattutto i Rothschild e i Morgan”. Di queste 12 banche, ben 9 erano di proprietà ebraica... Secondo il The American Jewish Experience, le principali banche americane di origine ebraica alla fine del XIX secolo erano: J.S. Bache, Hellman, Sears & Roebuck, Goldman & Sachs, R.H. Macy, Abraham & Strauss, Albert Loeb, J.W. Seligman, S.W. Straus, Wertheim, Steinhardt, Lewisohn, Guggenheim, Kuhn & Loeb, Speyer, Belmont, Hallgarten, Lehman, Heidelbach & Ickelheimer. Le sei maggiori case hollywoodiane, l’oligopolio che controlla e gestisce ancora oggi la filmografia a livello planetario, non solo sono state fondate con i soldi delle banche qui sopra elencate, ma tutte sono nate da imprenditori dello stesso gruppo: Paramount (Zukor), Warner Bros (Warner), Loew-MGM (Mayer), Twentieth Century-Fox (William Fox), Universal (Laemmle), Columbia (F.lli Cohen). “Al giorno d’oggi sei produttori decidono in merito al novanta per cento delle sceneggiature e montano il novanta per cento dei film”. Frank Capra, regista Note [4] Intervista alla d.ssa Ida Magli dal “Civico20 News” di Torino. 2 marzo 2011, [5] Idem [6] Idem, pag. 285


  By: Fr@ncesco on Mercoledì 09 Ottobre 2013 05:15

[Moderatore] spiegazione di Ustica ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Be', di spiegazioni su Ustica ce ne sono a bizzeffe, il problema è capire quale sia quella che più si avvicini a ciò che davvero accadde allora. Ad esempio, questa è un'altra spiegazione ancora: Alla fine però non è poi così importante quale delle versioni si avvicini di più a ciò che è effettivamente avvenuto in quanto in ultima analisi tutte le strade portano "a Roma" cioè "a Tel Aviv":


  By: Moderatore on Mercoledì 09 Ottobre 2013 03:41

Gianni Lannes pensa di aver trovato la spiegazione di Ustica ====== 7 ottobre 13 ^STRAGE DI USTICA: ISRAELE, FRANCIA, ITALIA di - Gianni Lannes#^ Dopo 33 anni di menzogne non c'è più alcun mistero. Ne scrivo telegraficamente in forma di anticipazione per assicurarmi una sorta di assicurazione sulla vita. Il Dc 9 è stato abbattuto per errore dall'aviazione israeliana, ingannata dall'azione di disorientamento orchestrata dai governi di Francia e Italia che fornivano tecnologia nucleare all'Iraq. L'aereo di linea Itavia fu usato come specchietto per le allodole per consentire al velivolo transalpino che trasportava il secondo carico di uranio arricchito al 93 per cento, di raggiungere Baghdad. Negli Usa ho trovato alcune prove, altre in Francia e qualcuna da noi. La chiave di lettura è una traccia (AJ 453) impressa su una postazione radar del sistema Nadge (Nato) che individua un velivolo che fa guerra elettronica mimetizzandosi e poi attaccando il velivolo di linea italiano. La Libia e Gheddafi non c'entrano niente, compresa la messinscena del Mig 23 a Castelsilano. Cossiga per aver favorito l'impresa - ideata a Parigi e sostenuta a Roma - e per aver tenuto il becco chiuso fu promosso presidente (indegno) della Repubblica. E così tutte le altre marionette che recitarono una parte, compreso un magistrato allora applicato alla Procura della Repubblica di Roma, ottennero carriere in riscossione da allora. Gli Usa sanno tutto e hanno documentato l'orrore, ma ricattano da allora. post scriptum: Non ho alcuna intenzione di suicidarmi! Godo di ottima salute: sono uno sportivo!E se dovesse accadere qualcosa di irreparabile lo faranno passare come un incidente! Non credo che arrivino nuovamente all'omicidio, ma non si sa mai. Sismi e Sdece hanno già ammazzato 21 testimoni scomodi. In ogni caso già da tempo ho verbalizzato le mie scoperte ai due magistrati della Procura della Repubblica di Roma, Amelio e Monteleone. Ai due pm ho portato anche 4 testimoni diretti (ex militari dell'Aeronautica e della Marina Militare), mai interrogati dai giudici istruttori Bucarelli e Priore. I magistrati in ogni caso, hanno le mani legate. ======


  By: Gano* on Giovedì 03 Ottobre 2013 10:33

Quell' imbecille di Hollande non ha bombardato nessuno solo perché lo ha fermato Putin.


  By: pana on Giovedì 03 Ottobre 2013 09:07

Hollande non ha bombardato nssuno a differenza di Sarkozy il grosso debito Usa 'e ereditato dal war criminal texano, 4 trilioni per iraq e afghanistan He intanto mi leggo il risultato dell invasione dell Iraq di Bush,.. volevano esportare la democrazia, invece hanno esportato uranio impoverito e fosforo bianco..

Hamas Fighter Chases Israeli Tank With Explosive Device In Rafah | Watch What Happened - YouTube


  By: Gano* on Mercoledì 02 Ottobre 2013 21:03

Leggetevi ^com'è cretino Hollande#^


  By: Gano* on Mercoledì 02 Ottobre 2013 11:30

Pana, che fai? Caschi dal pero anche tu? Quel botolo ringhioso socialista di Hollande voleva per forza bombardare la Siria. Fai finta di essertene dimenticato? ^Syrie : Hollande bat les tambours de guerre! #^ Spero che un po' di francese tu lo biascichi.


  By: pana on Mercoledì 02 Ottobre 2013 09:04

Libia? Hollande? strano io mi ricordavo un certo Sarkozy(bella riconoscenza dopo che il Gheddafi gli ha finanziato la campagna elettorale conmilioni di euro ) , e poi parliamo di Bush, Iraq e afghanistan, quanti paesi ha invaso OBAMA ? secono uno studio di Harvard le 2 guerre di Bush coteranno dai 4 ai 6 trilioni $, ad esempmpio ora Roma affondain centiania di milionidi debiti, colpa di Ignazio Marino vero ?

Hamas Fighter Chases Israeli Tank With Explosive Device In Rafah | Watch What Happened - YouTube


  By: Gano* on Martedì 01 Ottobre 2013 20:09

Premio Nobel per la Pace? Obama voleva anche radere al suolo la Siria, non pago dei risultati ottenuti in Irak e Libia. Insieme al suo amico, quel botolo ringhioso socialista di Hollande.


  By: pana on Martedì 01 Ottobre 2013 09:22

che grande delusione OBAMA ! gli han dato il Nobeler per la pace e ora quando finalmente aveva l opportunita di far chiudere tutte le basina militari nelmondo ti segna la leggina per continuare a finanziarle malgrado lo shutdownche fare chiuddere solo i parchi ! che buffonata O ther services continue uninterrupted. Social Security and Medicare benefits would be paid. U.S. troops would remain at their posts around the world and would get paid under a bill Obama signed yesterday. Air traffic controllers and airport security screeners would keep working.

Hamas Fighter Chases Israeli Tank With Explosive Device In Rafah | Watch What Happened - YouTube


  By: Gano* on Domenica 29 Settembre 2013 21:34

> tu mi dirai che hanno offeso il senso religioso dei russi ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- No, dico piuttosto che ^quella delle Pussy Riots#^ è stata un gag organizzata ad uso e consumo del popolo (occidentale) bove e ignorante. E' di questo rango la protesta verso la Russia di Putin? Allora si sta freschi.... Forse sono state punite più per la stupidità che per l'offesa. Non certo per la stupidità loro, quanto quella del pubblico cui era rivolto il messaggio. I russi sono un popolo intelligente. Infatti la pena è stata clemente rispetto a quella che era stata chiesta dal magistrato secondo il codice penale russo. E' un po' triste vedere che la lobotomizzazione in Occidente è arrivata a tal punto che oggi sono queste le dimostrazioni di democrazia che fanno notizia. Come l' unico messaggio che è uscito dal Forum di Valdai è stato quello sulla gag di berlusconi e le donne. La fica! la fica! Pussy! pussy! Poi se in Europa abbiamo leader come quel botolo ringhioso di Hollande che fomenta la guerra in Siria fornendo armi ai ribelli e vuole per forza bombardare il paese allargando il conflitto e aprendo scenari sinistri, nessuno ci fa caso. Già dimenticatisi di quei bei risultati che abbiamo ottenuto in Libia e in Irak. Fa parte della stessa logica che in un Europa devastata dalla recessione e dalla disoccupazione, non ci si preoccupa della forbice sempre più grande tra ricchi e poveri né dello smantellamento dello stato sociale, né del fatto che la nostra e le future generazioni avranno una pensione con cui forse ci si potrà comprare il KitKat per cena. No. Ci si preoccupa dei cosiddetti "diritti civili" che altro non sono che i matrimoni fra persone dello stesso sesso e le adozioni gay. Al massimo ci si preoccupa di quali sono le troie che ha scopato berlusconi, arrivando a istruirci sopra processi (veri), mobilitando tribunali, avvocati, giornali, magistrati (tutti veri)... per la soddisfazione mediatica del popolo (bove). Fica! fica! pussy! pussy!


  By: gianlini on Domenica 29 Settembre 2013 20:09

certo che le difendo!! se c'è una cosa che mi manda in bestia è che chi proclama di agire in nome della religione, cioè di qualcosa di spirituale ed ultraterreno, vada poi a prendersela per un gesto fisico e infligga sofferenze mondane (cioè di mondo) a chi se ne rende protagonista anziché demandare al Dio in cui dice di credere eventuali punizioni di chi va contro la religione, si arroga il diritto di intervenire in prima persona lo trovo scandaloso! (e segno che tutta questa fiducia in Dio non c'è!!) tu mi dirai che hanno offeso il senso religioso dei russi; io trovo che dato che questo senso religioso non poggia su basi reali ma su assunzioni personali e arbitrarie, uno dovrebbe dire : tu mi offendi nel senso religioso che però so che può essere una mia fantasia e illusione, pertanto se c'è in tutto questo qualcosa di più realistico Iddio se ne prenderà cura (di punirti) altrimenti un'illusione non può certo essere offesa naturalmente quanto scritto sopra, vale a maggior ragione per i musulmani